Working Papers

When Disaster Strikes: The Impact of Tropical Cyclones and Mangrove Protection on Economic Activity in Coastal Communities.

with Paulo J. Murillo-Sandoval

Link to most recent draft

Abstract: Climate change is expected to increase the intensity and spatial extent of storms. Research suggests mangroves can serve as natural defensive structures and protect against cyclones and storm surges. We estimate the impacts of high- and low-intensity tropical cyclones on economic activity between 2014 and 2019 across communities in the global tropics. Using detailed measurements of distance to and size we study the protective role of mangroves at a global scale. We find that an average tropical cyclone (Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Category 1-5) leads to an immediate reduction in nightlight luminosity by 2.58% in the month it strikes. This translates to reduction in GDP by 1.66-2.49%. We find that places struck by high-intensity cyclones (113+ knots, SSH Cat. 4-5) are dricing the effect and experience large negative shocks in the month of the storm, with a reduction in economic activity (nightlights) by 5.17%, equivalent to a 3.33-5% reduction in GDP. There are important differences in recovery between communities in continental and island nations. We find that Caribbean Island communities lose 6 months of economic growth following a Cat. 4 or 5 hurricane, raising concerns about high fatality and injury rates. Our results suggest mangroves can protect communities from tropical cyclones, with protection increasing in mangrove area and decreasing in distance to nearest mangrove. We find heterogeneous effects by income, suggesting mangroves play an important role in protecting low and low-middle income nations from storms. For communities struck by high-intensity cyclones there is a trade-off between mangrove proximity and near-shore hazards (e.g., low elevation).

Crush and Burn:  How the destruction of ivory fails to save elephants.

(Under review at World Development)

Abstract: Elephant populations have declined by half since 1979. In response, activists have promoted destroying confiscated and stockpiled ivory to “send a message” to reduce elephant poaching and ivory demand. As a result, more than 280 tons of ivory has been destroyed between 1989 and 2017. This is the first paper to estimate the causal effect of the amount and location of these de- structions on the elephant poaching rate across African and Asian countries with elephants. I use data from CITES’ Monitoring of Illegal Killing of Elephants program from 2003 to 2019, paired with information on ivory destruction events. The main result is that the destruction of ivory does not reduce poaching rates. On the contrary, in African countries with elephants, ivory destructions increase poaching rates, with negative spillover effects from in-country events on the rest of the continent. This suggests the negative supply shock from the destructions dominate and incentivize poaching by increasing the (illicit) ivory price. For sites in Asia there is no evidence that elephant poaching rates respond to ivory destructions.

Coastal Erosion Protection on the Oregon Coast (working paper)

with Steven J. Dundas

(Draft available on request)

Abstract: Previous research on the value of beaches and dunes has focused its attention to the Eastern Coast of the United States, and has been limited in sample size and availability of measurements. We offer the first hedonic analysis of beach width, dune width, and dune height on a dynamic coastline with seasonal variability. We use panel data on beach width from a probabilistic climate emulator and cross-sectional measures of dunes on 13,140 property transactions between January 2005 and February 2020 in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Across the period, the estimates show that the average capitalization of dune height ranges from 176 to 21,322$/m, with higher marginal values for shorter dunes. Dune width capitalizes negatively at -1,197$/m. Beach width varies with proximity to the shoreline, and buyers of properties closest to the ocean place the highest marginal value on beach width. For properties within 50m of the shoreline beach width capitalizes at 4,531$/m. At the average, an additional meter of beach width capitalizes at 293$/m, and it declines to 0$/m approximately 600m from the shoreline. Previous studies have noted difficulty in obtaining accurate measures of beach width due to their dynamic nature, and have suggested an aggregate may better capture buyers’ expectations. We explore this in our second analysis by comparing panel and cross-sectional measurements. Our analysis suggests using an average across multiple observations in time, whether panel or cross-sectional, is a better fit and produces less sensitive estimates than the use of a measurement from a single point in time.

Highlighted publications

No peace for the forest: Rapid, widespread land changes in the Andes-Amazon region following the Colombian civil war. 2021. Paulo J. Murillo-Sandoval, Emma Gjerdseth, Camilo Correa-Ayram, David Wrathall, Jamon Van Den Hoek, Liliana M. Dávalos, and Robert Kennedy. Global Environmental Change, 69(102283).

Abstract: Negative environmental impacts of violent conflict have been observed worldwide. Whether or not active global conflicts are declining in number remains hotly debated, the number of countries entering post-conflict periods is on the rise, and the impact of this transition on land cover changes remains poorly understood. In Colombia, though large-scale armed conflict has concluded, the post-conflict period represents an ongoing threat to forest conservation, putting at risk commitments to meet global conservation goals and even those stipulated in the peace accord. This paper aims to assess land cover change associated with the Colombian conflict in the Andes-Amazon region between 1988 and 2019. First, we use the Landsat archive to map land cover and characterize the spatial patterns of change at the regional level. Second, to empirically identify the effect of conflict on land cover change, we employ a difference-in-difference approach using local conflict events data. During conflict (1988–2011), land cover in the Andes-Amazon remained relatively stable, however during the post-conflict period (2012–2019), the conversion from forest to agriculture increased by 40%. We find that forest cover surrounding conflict events (1 km radius) decreased significantly, on average by ~ 19% during conflict, which accelerated to ~ 30% in the post-conflict period. Similarly, agriculture expansion is most substantial during the post-conflict period, but exclusively in municipalities with population below the 50th percentile. Landscape metrics show that in peripheral municipalities (<50th), agriculture occurs in clumped distributions during the conflict period. Meanwhile, during the post-conflict period, this expansion happens more quickly, with significantly greater agricultural patch sizes than during the conflict period. We conclude that a slow implementation of conservation governance, the emergence of illegal land markets, and illicit land uses (i.e., coca and illegal cattle ranching) may accelerate land cover change in the coming years.

Presentations and Seminars

2024

Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (AERE) 2024 Summer Conference. Session: Ecosystems.

W5133 Annual Meeting, Feb 28-Mar 1, 2024. Session: Marine and Coastal.

2023

Seminar, Economics Department, Portland State University (Invited). November 2023.

Applied Economics Working Group Seminar, Oregon State University. November 2023.

Heartland Environmental and Resource Economics (HERE) Workshop. Short Research Presentation. October 2023.

Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (AERE) 2023 Summer Conference. Session: Flood Impacts.

The Convening for the Pacific Northwest Framework for Atmospheric Recovery (PNW FAR), Blue Carbon Working Group (Invited).

Applied Economics Working Group Seminar (Oregon State University).

2022

Western Economics Association International (WEAI) Conference, AERE session “Endangered species/Biodiversity”.

“State of the Dunes” Mini-Conference and Dune Management Workshop.

2021

Applied Economics Working Group Seminar (Oregon State University).

Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (AAEA) Joint Annual Meeting, AERE-ENV track session “GHG emissions from Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use: Impact, mitigation strategies, incentives, and regulation”.